![]() ![]() Like everything else, it came by the power of God, and if Newton doubted that perhaps he should take it up with the Pope, or maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury. Newton countered by mocking the whole idea of a putative so-called "life force" as superstitious nonsense, and sarcastically asked Leibniz if perhaps the laying on of hands were necessary to impart this special force to masses, and, if so, did it come by the power of God or perhaps Beelzebub. He said there was also a "vis viva" or "life force," proportional to the square of the velocity, that a mass acquires when it's accelerated to a given velocity with respect to another inertial frame. He thought there was more to motion than momentum. But Newton, perhaps the greatest genius of all time, had a bitter rival of almost equal genius. Hence, the impetus (now called "momentum") must be equal to the product of the mass times the velocity, or P = mv. This force imparted an impetus, P, sufficient to move a mass, m, to a velocity, v. Impart an "impetus" to the body which overcame the body's inherent inertia. So, Newton reasoned that when an outside force acted on a body at rest to create motion it had to ![]() Newton knew that unless acted upon by an outside force bodies in motion stayed in motion, and bodies at rest stayed at rest. For him there was no such thing! For Newton, there was mass and there was motion. But Newton didn't believe in energy, kinetic or otherwise. You see, at its core, the potential to beat craps comes down to the nature of kinetic energy. And therein lies a fascinating tale that is worth a little trip down history lane. If only Isaac Newton had been right, if only he'd been right, then maybe, just maybe, there might really be such a thing as AP casino craps. In fact, he sent me the following essay on dice control, and gave me permission to post it here. Since that time I have had an email exchange with Bryce, and found that Bryce is firmly on the other side. Bryce is the author of Blackjack For Blood, and very well respected in the advantage play community. When I read Wong's book he had some quotes from Bryce Carlson that lead me to believe that Bryce was a believer in dice control. That player is a man named KC, and he will be our guest this week. Wong mentioned a player that had won $1.5 million using what he thought was dice control, and then lost all the money back. If a player could do this it would be worth a fortune. The thesis of this book is that players can control the dice when they throw them and have 7 show up less than 1 in 6 times. A few weeks ago we had Stanford Wong on the show talking about his book Wong on Dice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |